Sir Frank Kitto Lectures
Wednesday 18 September 2019 6:00pm
The Honourable Fred Chaney AO
‘The Long Road to Uluru and Beyond’
The lecture will explore the significance of the Uluru Statement from the Heart and its place in the post settlement Indigenous journey. It is also relevant to the nation’s journey towards reconciliation. Its initial rejection by the Government was a blow to Indigenous Australians, and an examination of the reasons for opposing a constitutional enshrined Voice to Parliament is needed. The lecture will argue that the Voice to Parliament is of value both symbolically and practically but that understanding the reasons why some sections of the Australian community find any recognition proposition difficult is a key to successfully achieving recognition.
The Hon Fred Chaney AO practised law as a solicitor and barrister in Western Australia and the Territory of Papua and New Guinea before entering the Senate in 1974. He was leader of the Opposition in the Senate from 1983 to 1990. His ministerial portfolios included Aboriginal Affairs and Social Security. After leaving Parliament, he undertook research into Aboriginal Affairs policy and administration as a Research Fellow with the Graduate School of Management at the University of Western Australia. He was Chancellor of Murdoch University from 1995 until 2003. In 1994 he was appointed as a member of the National Native Title Tribunal. He served as Co-Chair of Reconciliation Australia Ltd from 2000 to 2005 and continues as a Director on the board. In 2007, he chaired the Consultation Committee on a Human Rights Act for Western Australia.
His distinguished career has been recognised through a number of awards, including being appointed as an Officer of the Order of Australia (AO), the Sir Ronald Wilson Leadership Award for ‘Exceptional leadership in the fields of social justice, human rights, equality and anti racism’ and, in 2014, Senior Australian of the Year.
Friday 18 May, 1.00pm
The Hon Michael Kirby, AC CMG
‘Dual Nationality and the Constitution. Do we need to amend the Constitution?’
JP Belshaw Lecture Theatre (LT1), EBL Building
Back in 1900, when the Constitution was adopted, there was no way that the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand or other realms of the British Crown could be regarded as a ‘’foreign power ‘’. So what happened on the way to recent decisions that led to the disqualification of members of the Federal Parliament, and in particular those who were nationals of the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand?
In this public talk Michael Kirby, a past Justice of the High Court of Australia, will explain the language and meaning of the provisions of the Australian Constitution, section 44 (i) disqualifying for election or participation in our Federal Parliament (House of Representatives or Senate) of any person who ‘’is under any acknowledgement of allegiance, obedience, or an adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power.”
Friday 1 September 2017 1.30pm
The Hon Justice Brian J Preston SC, Chief Judge of the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
‘What’s equity got to do with the environment?’
From the JP Belshaw Lecture Theatre (LT1), EBL Building Trevenna Rd, University of New England
It is a truth universally acknowledged that most humans, in possession of a good environment, must be in want of development of it. The development of the environment benefits some, burdens others and bypasses many. The distribution of the benefits and burdens of developing the environment raises issues of equity. The notion of equity concerns evenness, fairness and justice. The members of the community of justice comprise people of the present generation, people of future generations and non-human nature, present and future. Extending equity to these members involves intra-generational equity, inter-generational equity and inter-species equity. These three principles of equity fix not only the process of decision making concerning development of the environment but also the results of decision making. The results include maintaining a healthy, diverse and productive environment, now and in the future. The three principles of equity call for distributive justice, which is to be achieved by according procedural justice: a fair result reached by a fair process. This is what equity has to do with the environment.
6 September 2016 1:00pm Tuesday
Ms Raelene Webb QC President of the National Native Title Tribunal
JP Belshaw Lecture Theatre (LT1), EBL Building Trevenna Rd, University of New England
Whither native title?
In 1992, the legal recognition of the on-going existence of native title by the High Court in the Mabo decision was a watershed moment for Australia, finally freeing the country from the legal doctrine of ‘terra nullius’. For Indigenous Australians there was hope of positive change and empowerment, politically and economically. But terra nullius is also a state of mind, as well as a legal doctrine, and there was a reluctance in some quarters, which still lingers, to accept the reality of native title.
More than two decades on from Mabo and its federal legislative response – the Native Title Act 1993 – the law has defined and often constrained the scope of native title, with dismay in some Indigenous groups as to what native title has not delivered.
Is there still scope for native title to achieve positive change and empowerment for Indigenous groups? What are the key priorities if native title is to realise some of the hopes engendered by the Mabo decision?
Thursday 10 September 2015
Emeritus Professor Ron McCallum AO
'The United Nations Human Rights Treaties: What Will Be Their Future Role In Protecting Our Human Rights?'
In 1966, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Since these two foundation covenants, the General Assembly has adopted seven further conventions dealing with race, discrimination against women, childrens’ rights, the prevention of torture, the rights of persons with disabilities, the plight of migrant workers and enforced disappearances. Each covenant and convention has an elected committee which monitors its implementation and operation in countries which have ratified it.
This lecture will begin by unpacking and analysing these nine human rights treaties. The work of their committees in monitoring and in dealing with individual complaints will be explained. The April 2014 reforms by the General Assembly of the work of these committees will be examined. It will be argued that the nine human rights treaties cover many issues which arose in the last third of the previous Century. What new issues will arise for human rights in the early years of this new Century?
Wednesday 15 October 2014
Professor Gillian Triggs
'Australian exceptionalism: Human rights and executive power'
Australia is unique among comparable legal systems in that it has very few constitutional or legislative protections for most human rights. This fragmented approach to human rights has produced a significant gap in legal protections placing some groups at risk.
Of particular concern is the increasing use of executive discretion that is often not subject to judicial scrutiny. The abuse of executive powers arises in many contexts including: the introduction of new anti-terrorism laws; the administrative detention of those unfit to plead to criminal charges on the grounds of mental illness; the asylum seekers held under mandatory detention or judged by ASIO as a security risk; and the so called 'Bikie' laws. In light of this growing encroachment on fundamental rights and freedoms it is now time to reopen the public debate about a legislated form of human rights charter.
Monday 11 November 2013
The Honourable Justice Stephen Gageler
"Why Write Judgments?"
Friday 23 November 2012
The Honourable Bob Debus
Lawyer, journalist and former Attorney General, Minister for Corrections, Minister for Environment and Minister for Emergency Services in NSW and Federal Minister for Home Affairs
An independent legal system, a free press and an elected parliament are the basic institutions of democracy. Nevertheless at historical times of threat and fear both editorial opinion and public attitudes can easily turn against the fundamental values of justice that have been supported by lawyers and the law or centuries.
Friday 23 September 2011
Robert Shenton French
Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia
"What were they thinking? Statutory Interpretation and Parliamentary Intention"
Robert Shenton French was appointed Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in September 2008. At the time of his appointment he was a judge of the Federal Court of Australia, having been appointed to that office in November 1986. He graduated from the University of Western Australia in science and law. He was admitted in 1972 and practised as a barrister and solicitor in Western Australia until 1983 when he went to the Western Australian Bar. From 1994 to 1998 he was President of the National Native Title Tribunal. At the time of his appointment he was an additional member of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory and a member of the Supreme Court of Fiji. He was also a Deputy President of the Australian Competition Tribunal and a part-time member of the Australian Law Reform Commission. From 2001 to January 2005 he was president of the Australian Association of Constitutional Law. Chief Justice French was appointed a Companion in the General Division of the Order of Australia in 2010.
2010 Thursday 28 October
The Hon. Justice James Allsop
President of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of NSW
"Good faith and Australian contract law: a practical issue or a question of theory and principle?"
2009 Monday 2 November
Professor Keith Ewing
Kings College London
"Torture, Human Rights and the Rule of Law"
2008 12 October
Hon. Greg James QC
"Mental Health Law Reform in New South Wales"
Greg James has had a fine and distinguished career in the legal profession as a criminal barrister. He has been an Australian War Crimes Prosecutor and on the Criminal Trial and Appeal Counsel; he has served as a Supreme Court Judge, worked in the NSW Law Reform Commission and the Royal Commission, and been President of the NSW Mental Health Review Tribunal.
2007 17 April
Professor Adam Tomkins
"The Rule of Law in Blair's Britain"
"The post-September 11 'terrorist age' has presented real challenges to the rule of law," Mr Lunney said. "While we might be familiar, to some extent, with what is happening in Australia, it is very important and instructive to see what is happening in the United Kingdom. That legal system is the one from which we draw our roots, including our fundamental commitment to the rule of law, and so it is interesting to see how these challenges have been dealt with in the United Kingdom. It is clearly important for the general public, as well as academics, to gain a better understanding of how the rule of law is working in Australia in the post-September 11 era, and an awareness of what is happening in our closest 'neighbour' (in legal terms) adds to that understanding."
2006 9 August
Professor John McMillan
"Rethinking the Separation of Powers"
2005 23 September - Official opening of the "Sir Frank Kitto Moot Court"
Honourable Justice Keith Mason, A.C
President of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of NSW
The President of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of NSW, the Honourable Justice Keith Mason, A.C., officially opened the State's newest "moot" courtroom last Friday [23 September].
The courtroom, at The University of New England, is specially designed to allow UNE law students to "moot" (i.e., engage in hearings of hypothetical court cases).
Justice Mason said the new Moot Court was as good as anything of its kind he had seen. "It's a tribute to the people who planned it," he said.
Watched by the guests at the opening ceremony (including Armidale magistrate His Honour Michael Holmes, and Armidale Dumaresq Mayor Councillor Peter Ducat) Justice Mason unveiled a plaque, naming the courtroom the "Sir Frank Kitto Moot Court". Sir Frank Kitto, who died in Armidale in 1994, was a Justice of the High Court of Australia (1950-1970), Chancellor of The University of New England (1970-1981), and the inaugural Chairman of the Australian Press Council (1976-1982). Justice Mason reviewed some of Sir Frank Kitto's outstanding qualities as a judge, including his distinguished prose style, his "rigorous application of logic from established principles", and his "capacity to detect a fallacy at a hundred paces".
Professor Stephen Guest
Professor of Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Laws, University College London
"Judging and Justice" - Sir Frank Kitto and Legalism
2002 8 August
Dr Sev Ozdowski OAM
Australian Human Rights Commissioner and Disability Discrimination Commissioner
"Human Rights" - The Australian and International Perspective.
2001 23 March
Justice Michael Kirby
Justice of the High Court of Australia
"The future of human rights"
2001 31 May
Director of Public Prosecutions
"Getting Justice Wrong"
1999 27 May
Roderick P. Meagher
NSW Supreme Court
"Sir Frederick Jordan's Footnote"
1998 22 May
High Court of Australia
"Kitto and the High Court of Australia – Change and Continuity"
1995 25 May
Sir Anthony Mason
Chief Justice, High court of Australia
"Equity and Contract – A Dance to the Music of Time"