Structuring your material
There are several recognised strategies for organising information in an oral presentation.
Eric Walters and Gale Climenson Walters summarise 5 different 'recipes' for structuring a presentation (Scientists Must Speak: bringing presentations to life, 2002, pp17-26). You may like to investigate these, and adopt or adapt one that will suit your material and purposes.
For the confirmation presentation, however, it is generally expected that you will speak to the written report you have already prepared. The report, and hence your talk, have an implied structure in that you must inform your audience about 5 main items. The research questions you will investigate:
- What is already known on this topic - the literature review
- The framework or methods you will use in your investigation
- The work you have done to date - how much of your research plan is already completed?
- The importance and relevance of your project.
One means of presenting this information is through a simple introduction-body-conclusion structure:
- Tell your audience what you will be talking about (the 5 listed items),
- Proceed to do so, and
- Conclude by recapping your main points.
Using this structure, your confirmation presentation might proceed as follows:
|
Introduction |
Preview |
|
Body 1: |
What need or problem will the study address? |
|
Body 2: |
What work has already been done on this topic/problem? |
|
Body 3: |
What methods or approaches will you use to answer your research questions? |
|
|
Why these and not others? |
|
Body 4: |
What are the major stages of the project? |
|
Body 5: |
Once completed, how will your study address the need, problem or gap identified in body 1 and 2? |
|
Conclusion |
Review (in order): |