| Project Title |
Developmentally-based
assessment practices in analysing the strengths of technologically-based
curricula |
| Project Team |
Professor John Pegg, Dr
Debra Panizzon, Dr Steven McGee (NASA Classroom of the Future) |
| Period |
2004 – 2005 |
| Funding Agency |
|
| Organisational Base |
SiMERR National Centre
and Wheeling University |
The focus of collaboration
is about melding the development and application of innovative state-of-the-art
technologically-based curricula with an assessment model which is able
to categorise the underlying structure of students’ understanding
in terms of a cognitive developmental framework.
This proposal’s significance lies in four broad areas.
- The development of programs of research which link the development
and research work of the NASA Classroom of the Future Program with the
curriculum
and research expertise of members of CRiLT.
- Fine-tuning the assessment
techniques available at the UNE research Centre so that it is more applicable
and useable in an information technology environment.
- Setting up a framework in which the theoretical model can be utilised
to identify strengths and weaknesses in the way educational programs
encourage higher-order forms of learning.
- Using the opportunity presented by this collaboration to link with science
and technology-based industries both within Australia and the
US.
The background of the work builds upon the links established between
the two centres and clarified by the visit to UNE by Dr Steven McGee
(senior
educational researcher) for three weeks in August 1999. During this
time, recent curriculum supplements from the NASA Classroom of the
Future were
trialled with Australian primary and secondary students. In particular,
the packages involved the use of technology-based curricula. Members
from the
research Centre at UNE evaluated the effectiveness of the program
using a qualitative theoretical model, which underpins much of the
work of
the Centre.
Such an approach had not been used previously by the NASA U.S. researchers,
and it acted as an important balance to the quantitative procedures
they already had in place. As a result, this preliminary work opened
up the
potential for a new way of looking at, and evaluating the use and
applicability of,
the assessment model in a range of research, teaching and learning
environments based upon advanced educational technologies.
|