You are here: UNE Home / Law School / Kirby Seminars

Kirby Seminar Series

About the Series

The Kirby Seminar Series began on 23 March, 2001 with the inaugural seminar presented by Justice Michael Kirby of the High Court of Australia entitled, The Future of Human Rights.

The purpose of the series is to stimulate and share ideas for, and the substance of, legal scholarship through attracting high calibre national and international speakers, drawing upon academics from the wider university community and offering a platform for researchers (including PhD students) from within the UNE School of Law.

Given the diversity of the speakers (including their topics, backgrounds and from where they are coming), there are no set dates, times and places for the seminars – rather, these are fixed to accommodate each particular speaker and are advertised to staff and students in advance. Generally, the seminars run for one hour (including questions) during term time and are usually held in the J.N. Lewis Seminar Room within the School of Law.

The series is conducted by the School research committee and is convened by Julia Werren who can be contacted for more information.

2009 Seminars

Wednesday 11 Nov.

3:00–4:00 pm, with refreshments to follow

Lewis Seminar Room
W38
EBL Building

Michael Jeffrey

Professor Michael Jeffrey, QC

University of Western Sydney
Capture and Storage: Wishful Thinking or a Meaningful Part of the Climate Change Solution
.

Abstract: In the lead-up to the climate change negotiations that are scheduled to take place in Copenhagen towards the end of 2009, pursuant to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, and in order to reach agreement on a post-Kyoto Protocol international climate change regime, many countries around the globe are considering the options available to them to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in a manner that will minimize the cost impacts to economies already battered from the onslaught of the 2008 global financial crisis. In addition to confronting a markedly changed geopolitical landscape including the election of a new administration in the United States under the Democrats and President Barack Obama, the ongoing military confrontation between Hamas and the Israelis in Gaza, an outbreak of terrorist attacks in Mumbai, and Iran drawing ever closer to the possible development of nuclear weapons, the international community is facing what is predicted by some to be the most severe and prolonged economic downturn since the 1930s and the Great Depression. The collapse of the banking systems in several countries Triggered, in part, by the sub-prime mortgage crisis in the United States has inevitably led to a credit crisis around the globe as job layoffs are expected to climb throughout 2009 and into 2010. The impact of these events on the ability of the international community to address the climate change challenges that lie ahead is fraught with uncertainty and the reluctance of the world’s major coal producers to abandon or curtail an industry of vital economic importance in terms of both jobs and exports, has elevated carbon capture and storage (CCS) to increasing levels of importance in the consideration of available energy options. It remains to be seen whether the attention and investment dollars presently committed to the development of CCS technologies around the globe is warranted. This address will endeavour to outline how CCS is currently viewed by Australia and the European Union as part of their respective energy strategies.

Monday 2 Nov.

12:00–1:00 pm, with lunch to follow

EBL Lecture Theatre 4
W38
EBL Building

The Annual Sir Frank Kitto Law Lecture

Professor Keith Ewing from Kings College London will deliver The 2009 Annual Sir Frank Kitto Law Lecture, Torture, Human Rights and the Rule of Law.

Professor Ewing is a leading public law scholar. He has co-authored important texts on civil liberties including Freedom Under Thatcher: Civil Liberties in Modern Britain and The Struggle for Civil Liberties: Political Freedom and the Rule of Law in Britain (both with Professor Conor Gearty). His most recent work, The Bonfire of the Liberties: New Labour, Human Rights, and the Rule of Law, is soon to be published by Oxford University Press.

3 Sept.

12:00–1:00 PM

JN Lewis Seminar Room
W38
EBL Building

John MancyJohn Mancy

John Mancy is a Sydney-based barrister, part-time law lecturer, founder and managing editor of Legal Bulletin Service.

“Animal Law: Why?”

“Animal Law”. No doubt it’s all very worthy. The Australian Law Reform Commission President Professor David Weisbrot thinks it might be “the next great social justice movement”.

But is “Animal Law” (whatever it might entail?) worthy of “real” legal study? Does it warrant serious consideration for a place on a legal curriculum? After all, there is no “Animal Law” as such. Animal Law issues can crop up in almost any of the traditional legal disciplines. Could an Animal Law course – no matter how well conceived - provide any real benefits to students?

This seminar will look beyond the core content of a typical Animal Law course: History & Ethics; Animal Welfare legislation: interpretation and application, standing and enforcement; Use of animals as food, for clothing, entertainment or scientific experimentation; pets, pests and native wildlife. This seminar will consider whether, by engaging students in the subject matter by virtue of their personal connection to the issues being raised, Animal Law can lead them to a deeper understanding of the nature of the legal system. What constitutes a legal interest, what doesn’t, and who decides these things and by what process?

Instead of dealing with subjects of an effectively abstract nature with which most law students might have had little personal experience, critical Animal Law questions arise in a very familiar and “real life” context, involving ordinary student behaviour (eg what they eat or wear) and the moral choices involved. Thus, students may be forced to confront and critique the way in which the legal system recognizes some interests at the expense of others.

14 July

12:00–1:00 PM

JN Lewis Seminar Room
W38
EBL Building

Professor Don Rothwell

Australian National University, Canberra

“Capital Punishment and Diplomatic Protection: Australia's Experience in Responding to its Citizens in Peril”

Throughout the past decade Australia has been confronted with a number of challenges arising from its citizens being sentenced to death in overseas countries. In some instances, as with a number of Australians held in Vietnam, the Australian government has been successful in requesting that clemency be applied and the death sentence has been commuted. In other instances, such as the case of Van Nguyen in Singapore in 2005, the government's diplomatic efforts have failed. Currently, there are three Australians on death row in Indonesia; all members of the so-called Bali Nine who were arrested for drug trafficking offences in Bali in 2005. Whilst the Australians held in Bali had yet to exhaust their local judicial remedies, there is growing concern as to their plight and what options may ultimately be open to the Australian government to ensure the death penalty is not applied. This seminar will explore these issues, especially the rights and obligations the Australian government may have towards its citizens who are being detained overseas and in circumstances of peril. It will also review the position of successive Australian governments towards the death penalty.

25 June

12:00–1:00 PM

JN Lewis Seminar Room
W38
EBL Building

Associate Professor Angus Corbett

University of Technology, Sydney

“The Priority Of Contextual Meaning: A Theory of Judicial Interpretation”

In the next instalment of the Kirby Seminar Series, coordinated by the UNE School of Law Research Committee, Associate Professor Angus Corbett of the University of Technology Sydney will speak on the topic of “The Missing Dimension of Safety: The Liability of Statutory Authorities for Failing to Prevent Harm Associated with the use of Roads”. The seminar will take place at noon on 25 June 2009 in the Lewis Seminar Room (W38, Law School Building). Associate Professor Corbett’s paper is concerned with the missing dimension of safety in the regulation of the use of roads. It investigates a number of well known cases that deal with the application of principles determining when statutory authorities will be liable for failing to prevent harm associated with the use of roads. This analysis reveals that it is often rational to limit liability of statutory authorities for failing to prevent harms associated with the use of roads. But it also reveals evidence that these authorities lack the capacity to develop safety systems that are needed to prevent many harms that are associated with the use of roads. The argument developed in this paper is that it is important for courts to acknowledge both the failure of statutory authorities to develop safety systems and the complexity of the task of establishing these safety systems. Acknowledging the complexity of the problem of improving safety will assist in creating a context in which governments, statutory authorities, community organisations and members of the public are able to probe our ’social structure and culture to see how these promote’ our vulnerability to damage associated with complex systems such as roads.

19 May

12:00–1:00 PM

JN Lewis Seminar Room
W38
EBL Building

Dr Jonathan Crowe

Senior Lecturer, University of Queensland

“The Priority Of Contextual Meaning: A Theory of Judicial Interpretation”

Dr Crowe will argue that, in interpreting legal texts, judges should seek to give effect to their contextual meaning: the meaning they hold when considered in the full light of their broader social and moral context. He will argue first that, as a descriptive matter, contextual meaning is necessarily prior to any more restricted form of textual interpretation; that is, the contextual meaning of a legal text is its ordinary meaning. He will then advance two arguments for the proposition that, other things being equal, judicial interpretation of legal texts ought to follow their ordinary (or contextual) meaning. The final parts of his paper explore the nature and limitations of the contextualist model of judicial practice. The possibility of conflicts between contextual factors at different levels of abstraction makes it necessary to distinguish between narrow and wide versions of the contextualist methodology. He argues that wide contextualism offers the best overall account of judicial practice.

19 March

12:00–1:00 PM

JN Lewis Seminar Room
W38
EBL Building

   Professor Dr Dieter Dörr 

Chair in Public Law, International and European Law, Media Law, Johannes Gutenberg

University Mainz and Director, Mainz Media Institute

“The Tension between Ensuring and Protecting Personal Reputation and Free Speech: Comparative Perspectives - An Overview of the German Constitutional Court’s position on Defamation and Hate Speech under consideration of Art. 10 European Convention on Human Rights.”

 

2008 Seminars

2 October 2008
12:00–1:00 PM

J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Associate Professor Chris RenschlerDr Chris S Renschler

Associate Professor, University of Buffalo, The State University of New York, USA

“Decision-Support Tools for Integrated Natural Resources and GeoHazards Management: Scientific and Legal Challenges for Development and Implementation”

Dr Renschler is currently a Visiting Fellow in the School of Geography, Planning and Architecture at the University of Queensland in Brisbane.  His seminar will discuss issues relating to decision- and policy-making in natural resources or natural hazards management and specifically, his current project involving the development of a conceptual framework for measuring, assessing, and monitoring an integrated Community Resilience Index (CRI), a toolkit that integrates quantitative and qualitative methods using spatial and non-spatial data to identify scientifically defensible indicators for community resilience, and an implementation plan that enables local and regional stakeholders to continuously monitor and enhance their resilience against episodic and slow-onset extreme events.

23 July 2008
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Professor John BeckerProfessor John Becker

Professor, Penn State University

Australian Water Law Reform: A Case Study for Reform of Water Law Systems

18 March 2008
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Ms Susan FranckMs Susan Franck

Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Law College

International Law and Empiricism: Reality Testing Claims About International Investment Disputes

2007 Seminars

DateSpeaker/Topic
29 November 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Professor Donna CraigProfessor Donna Craig

Centre for Environmental Law, Macquarie University

Recognition of Customary Law in Natural Resource Management

5 November 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Mr Phillip FalkPhillip Falk

Griffith University

Workshop on Indigenous Inclusive Teaching and Learning Practices in Law

This seminar will address a holistic approach to developing and implementing Indigenous knowledge and perspectives within the Law School. This holistic approach encompasses the elements of Curriculum Development; Teaching and Learning, Indigenous Research; Staff Development and Training; and Student Support. These elements will be explored by drawing upon Mr Falk’s experience at Griffith University’s School of Law.

Phillip Falk is a Wiradjuri man (Central West NSW) who resides in Bundjalung country in Northern NSW. He is a Senior Lecturer at Griffith University’s School of Law and specialises in Indigenous curriculum development and its implementation..

18 October 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Mr Matthew SkinnerMatthew Skinner

Partner, Allens Arthur Robinson

Climate Change Litigation — How real is the risk?

16 October 2007
1:00–2:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Ms Aileen KennedyAileen Kennedy

Associate Lecturer, School of Law, UNE

The Undiscovered Country: Brain death, cognitive death and wrongful life

12 October 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (Lecture Theatre 5, W39)

Hon. Greg James QC

President, Mental Health Review Tribunal

“Mental Health Law Reform in New South Wales”

5 October 2007
9:00–10:00 AM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Mr Peter LongPeter Long

Long Howland Lawyers & Advisors

Economics, Business and Law in the Blender of Farm Succession

17 August 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (Lecture Theatre 5, W39)

Professor Indira Carr

University of Surrey

Corruption: Legal Solutions and Limits of Law

9 August 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Mr Craig CollinsMr Craig Collins

Lecturer, UNE School of Law

Pericles was a Plumber: Towards Resolving the ‘Vocational’ and ‘Liberal’ Dichotomy in Legal Education

30 July 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Dr Rob McLaughlin

Royal Australian Navy
Legal Adviser, Military Strategic Commitments, Australian Defence Headquarters, Canberra

Current and Evolving Challenges in the Law of Armed Conflict

Dr McLaughlin will discuss changing paradigms in the law of armed conflict, including civilianisation of military issues and militarisation of civilian issues.

31 May 2007
1:00–2:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Dr Ann BrowerDr Ann Brower

Lincoln University, Christchurch NZ

Closing the Deal at any Cost: Principals, Agents, and Sub-Agents in New Zealand Land Reform

Ellickson (1991) argues that welfare-enhancing norms, not the law, often prevail when adjudicating disputes over property. In 1990, about 20% of the South Island of New Zealand consisted of Crown land under long-term lease to pastoral farmers. 77 leaseholds have since been partially privatised through “tenure review,” a bilateral exchange of property rights whereby lessees acquire freehold title to part of their former leaseholds and the Crown resumes land for conservation. Using data on the 77 deals completed to date, we test and reject the hypothesis that the value of property rights exchanged drives prices, no matter who claims to own which rights. Instead, prices lie on or below the lessees’ demand curve for freehold land, and reveal that who acquires how much land is irrelevant to price. This is consistent with both Ellicksonian and agency theories. Heretofore classified prices appear to give rise to a principal-agent problem with a new twist — the contractor subagent. The ministerial principal directs the agent to close deals at minimal cost to the Crown; but the agent rewards the subagent for closing deals, regardless of cost. Hence subagents do not resist lessees’ rent-seeking, and the lessees’ demand curve serves as the lower bound for generosity in price. This outcome is welfare-enhancing to all present at the negotiating table — the lessee, the agent, and the subagent — at the expense of the public.
Ann L. Brower, Adrian Monks and Philip Meguire

30 May 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Justin Rose

Ag Law Centre, UNE

Legal Pluralism and Environmental Governance in Papua New Guinea, Vanuatu and the Federated States of Micronesia

Justin Rose is among an international team of scholars currently investigating the ongoing and adapting roles of customary laws and indigenous institutions in environmental governance in Melanesia and Micronesia, as well as interactivity between these and state-based laws, institutions and interventions. Justin’s seminar overviews this research, discusses its relevance to broader discourses in policy and law and for ecologically sustainable development, and summarises the preliminary findings.

30 April 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Dr Dayle Smith

Brisbane Bar (Retired)

Quo Warranto? (By What Authority?)
The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal

A special screening of rarely seen footage of the tokyo war crimes tribunal with commentary by Dr Smith, including observations on the parallels with the US Military Commission trials of David Hicks and others.

12 March 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Professor Michael HahnProfessor Michael Hahn

University of Waikato, Hamilton, NZ

The World Trading System – From Single Undertaking to a Two-Track Approach

The Treaty establishing the World Trade Organization and the attached Agreements dealing with trade in goods, trade in services, trade-related intellectual property rights and, not the least, dispute settlement is viewed by many scholarly writers as a treaty of constitutional quality. Its dispute settlement mechanism is more advanced than any other international dispute settlement mechanism. Even more important than such a theoretical classification is the acceptance by Member States. The WTO Dispute Settlement is massively used by Members, making sure that by and large violations of WTO law will be established by and in an impartial forum on a regular basis. While this has not prevented Member states from breaking WTO law, it is probably fair to say that adherence to WTO obligations is high. The success of the WTO – Vietnam joined as the 150th Member recently – could be the cause for some of its difficulties. Since the establishment of the WTO more than 250 bilateral trade agreements have been concluded. As of today almost half of the world’s trade is (also) governed by those FTAs.

Professor Hahn’s Kirby Seminar will highlight the problems caused by this multitude of partially overlapping trade regimes and propose potential remedies. He is an expert on international economic law, in particular WTO and EC foreign trade law. After a receiving a law degree from Frankfurt University, Professor Hahn joined the prestigious Max-Planck-Institute for Comparative Public Law and Public International Law in Heidelberg, Germany as a research fellow. He earned his doctorate with a study on “Unilateral Suspensions of GATT Obligations as Reprisal”. Professor Hahn held positions at several German and US Law Schools. In October 2005 he was appointed Professor at the University of Waikato Law School. He also teaches as a visiting Professor at Saarland University. Professor Hahn’s latest publications deal with cultural diversity, EC foreign trade law and legal problems of the regulation of biotechnology. He has just been invited to co-author the 3rd edition of the standard WTO treatise Matsushita/Schoenbaum/Mavroidis, The WTO – Law, Practice and Policy (OUP, 2nd ed. published in 2006). Professor Hahn is also a Member of the International Law Association’s International Trade Law Committee.

28 February 2007
12:00–1:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Professor Brad ShermanProfessor Brad Sherman

Director Australian Centre for Intellectual Property in Agriculture, University of Queensland

The Original Clones – On the Emergence of Intellectual Property Rights in Living Organisms

2006 Seminars

DateSpeaker/Topic
15 December 2006
1:00–2:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room, Faculty of Economics, Business and Law)

Mr Craig CollinsCraig Collins

Lecturer, UNE School of Law.

The Libel Trials of Andrew Bent, 1825–1838

This paper is introduced with an overview of the larger PhD project, ‘Defamation in the Australian Colonies, 1824–1874’, including an approach to methodology and explanation as to how this sub-topic fits into that larger picture as something of a case study. Andrew Bent, as an ex-convict, is not widely recognised for initiating the free press in the Australian colonies. In the period 1825–1838, Bent was a defendant in some nine libel actions in the Supreme Court of Van Diemen’s Land. Two of these cases are examined as having particular significance, with a specific focus upon the role of defamation law in transforming the nature and boundaries of public speech in Van Diemen's Land over the relevant period.

25 October 2006
1:00–2:00 PM (Lecture Theatre 5, Faculty of Economics, Business and Law)

Professor Jim JacksonProfessor Jim Jackson

School of Law and Justice, Southern Cross University.

University Governance: Councils, Vice Chancellor’s Executives, Academic Boards and the Law

Professor Jackson was the foundation Dean of the School of Law and Justice, Southern Cross University, and headed the School until February 1998. His specialities are in commercial, company and higher education law. He is the author of a number of books and articles, including Australian Corporate Law with Tomasic and Woellner. Professor Jackson’s doctorate was entitled “Academic Freedom in Australian Universities”. Currently he is publishing in the areas of academic freedom, legal obligations of members of university councils, and the application of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) to universities.

5 October 2006
2:30–3:30 PM (Moot Court, Economics, Business and Law)

Mr Cormack DunnCormack Dunn

Corrs Chambers Westgarth Lawyers.

Go Directly to Gaol – New Frontiers in OHS Law

Mr Dunn is acting for the first CEO of a publicly listed company charged with an OHS offence. These are criminal offences which carry a possible sentence of imprisonment for up to 5 years. This prosecution is the first of a number now on foot and reflects a significant change in policy by the NSW government towards director and manager obligations under OHS legislation. Mr Dunn will present on the ramifications this prosecution policy has upon persons charged and its appropriateness in light of limits under the legislation. Mr Dunn has acted for a number of large international and Australian corporations in relation to OHS prosecutions. Prior to joining Corrs Chambers Westgarth Lawyers in 2004, Mr Dunn worked for the NSW Police, WorkCover NSW and the NSW Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

7 September 2006
1:00–2:00 PM (Lecture Theatre 4, Economics, Business and Law)

Professor Hilary CharlesworthProfessor Hilary Charlesworth

Professor in RegNet and Director of the Centre for International Governance and Justice. Professor of International Law and Human Rights in the College of Law, ANU.

The Problems of Building Justice and Democracy after Conflict

Professor Charlesworth’s interests are in international law and human rights law. She has held visiting appointments at Washington & Lee School of Law, Harvard Law School, NYU Global Law School and in 2005 was the 24th Wayne Morse Professor at the University of Oregon. Current research projects include the legitimacy of UN Security Council decisions, the impact of international law on Australian law and the role of women in international dispute resolution. She has worked with various non-governmental human rights organisations on ways to implement international human rights standards and was chair of the ACT Government’s inquiry into an ACT Bill of Rights, which culminated in the adoption of the ACT Human Rights Act 2004. She is Patron of the ACT Women’s Legal Service. In 2005, she was awarded a Federation Fellowship by the Australian Research Council.

2 June 2006
9:15–10:30 AM (Lecture Room A2, Arts Building)

Dr Charlotte SmithDr Charlotte Smith

Lecturer, School of Law, University of Reading

Reformulating the Body Spiritual: The Identification and Representation of the Church of England in the Later Nineteenth Century

23 May 2006
1:00–2:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Associate Professor Russell HoggAssociate Professor Russell Hogg

Russell Hogg has published widely in the areas of criminology and criminal justice studies, including Policing the Rural Crisis (Federation Press, 2006, co-authored with Kerry Carrington) and Critical Criminology: Issues, Debates, Challenges (Willan, 2002, co-edited with Kerry Carrington). He is also co-editor of a forthcoming collection of essays on crime in rural Australia.

Executive Proscription of Terrorist Organisations

1 May 2006
1:00–2:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Associate Professor Belinda BennettAssociate Professor Belinda Bennett

Pro-Dean (Teaching Programs) and Director of the Centre for Health Governance, Law and Ethics at the Faculty of Law, University of Sydney

The Next Pandemic?: Globalisation and Public Health Laws

10 March 2006
2:00–3:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Dr. Joellen RileyDr Joellen Riley

Senior Lecturer, Sydney Law School, University of Sydney

A critical overview of Work Choices and its impact on the regulation of the Australian labour market

Dr Joellen Riley has been teaching and researching in the fields of labour law and commercial law since joining the Law Faculty of the University of Sydney in 1998. She is also a consultant with Harmers Workplace Lawyers, and academic adviser to the Law Society of NSW’s Specialist Accreditation Committee on Employment and Industrial Law. Her publications include Workplace Relations: A Guide to the 1996 Changes (LBC, 1997), Employee Protection at Common Law (Federation 2005), and she has two books due for publication in 2006 – The Law of Work with Rosemary Owens (OUP) and Work Choices: A Guide to the 2005 Changes with Kate Peterson (LBC).

10 March 2006
11:00–12:00 noon (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Ms Amanda WilliamsonAmanda Kennedy (nee Williamson)

PhD Candidate, School of Law, UNE

’Supple, Sassier and Commercially-Minded‘? Assessing the current higher education employment relations agenda and the drive to individualise the Australian academic employment relationship

2005 Seminars

DateSpeaker/Topic
15 November 2005
1:00–2:00 PM (J.N. Lewis Seminar Room)

Dr Mike RedmayneDr Mike Redmayne

Reader in Law, London School of Economics

What is wrong with character evidence?

Abstract: The common law has traditionally excluded bad character evidence against defendants (bad character evidence usually means that the accused has a previous conviction). Thus, if D is on trial for burglary, evidence that he has previously committed burglary cannot be admitted; there are various exceptions to the rule, eg where the previous conviction provides particularly compelling evidence of guilt. The usual reason given for the exclusionary rule is that bad character evidence is prejudicial, but that is not very convincing. Taking this as given, the question arises: what other reasons might there be for generally excluding bad character evidence? In this paper, I explore other possible exceptions, drawing on literature in criminology and sentencing theory to probe the possibility that the exclusionary rule might be justified by a concern for the autonomy of defendants.

8 November 2005
12:30 PM (LSR)

Aileen KennedyAileen Kennedy

Associate Lecturer, School of Law, UNE

Trafficking in humans for sexual exploitation: An assessment of Australia’s law and policy response.

26 October 2005
1:00 PM (LSR)

Dr David HamerDr David Hamer

Senior Lecturer, School of Law, UNE

Reconciling reverse burdens of proof with the presumption of innocence under the Human Rights Act 1998 (UK)

4 October 2005
12:30 PM (LSR)

Dr Liz FisherDr Liz Fisher

Tutorial Fellow in Law at Corpus Christi College, Oxford University

‘A Duty to Be Cautious’: The Precautionary Principle and Australian Courts and Tribunals

30 September 2005
1:00 PM (Paul Barrett Lecture Theatre, Psychology Building)

Professor Pat Carlen

[Co-hosted with Sociology, School of Social Sciences]
Visiting Professor of Criminology, Kent University, United Kingdom

Imprisonment and the Penal Body Politic

27 September 2005
1:00 PM (Dean’s Conference Room)

Carolyn MiddletonCarolyn Middleton

LLM research student, School of Law, UNE

Is the judicial discretion to admit illegally or improperly obtained evidence, predictable or effective?

6 September 2005
1:00 PM (LSR)

Professor Charles RickettProfessor Charles Rickett

Sir Gerard Brennan Professor of Law; Head, TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland

The Province of the Law of Tracing

18 August 2005

Professor Stuart KayeStuart Kaye

Professor, Dean of Law, University of Wollongong

Australia’s Maritime Boundary with East Timor: The Rise and Fall of the Timor Gap

23 June 2005

Robert LaurenceRobert Laurence

Robert A Leflar Distinguished Professor of Law, University of Arkansas, United States

Sovereignty & Property: American Indian law, Australian Aboriginal law and the concepts of ownership and governance

26 May 2005

Michael EburnMichael Eburn

Senior Lecturer, School of Law, University of New England

The Felons Apprehension Acts 1865–1899 (NSW)

5 May 2005

Professor Peter CanePeter Cane

Professor, Head of Law, Law and Philosophy Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University

The New Face of Advocates’ Immunity

9 March 2005

Harry GedddesHarry Geddes

Associate Professor, School of Law, The University of New England

The Modern Approach to Statutory Interpretation

16 February 2005

John BeckerJohn Becker

Professor of Agricultural Economics and Law
The Pennsylvania State University, USA

Community Conflicts Over Large Scale Production Facilities: A Research Report

2004 Kirby Seminar Series

DateSpeaker/Topic
15 October 2004

Barbara Holborow

Former Magistrate of the NSW Children’s Court

Is There Really a Juvenile Justice?

21 September 2004

Christopher Enright

PhD Student in Law, School of Law, University of New England.
Author of: Legal Techinque (2002), Federation Press

Models for Working with Law – Teaching and Researching

1 September 2004

Mark LunneyMark Lunney

Associate Professor, School of Law, University of New England

Historical Context in the Common Law of Tort: How to Get It and What to Make Of It

27 August 2004

Mark Spackman

Professor, School of Biological, Biomedical & Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of New England

ARC Research Grants: Tips and Hints

30 July 2004

Frank Brennan

Lawyer, Jesuit Priest, Social Justice Campaigner
Author of: Tampering with Asylum; Legislating Liberty; Too Much Order With Too Little Law etc.

Can Lawyers Help Resolve the Timor Gap Crisis?

16 June 2004

Jim Thomson

LLM, PhD Harvard

A Tub to a Whale: The Non Utility of a Bill of Rights in Australia

11 June 2004

Martin Chanock

Professor, School of Law and Legal Studies, La Trobe University

Globalisation and Legal Transplants: Understanding Law in Context

4 May 2004

Stephen GuestStephen Guest

Professor of Legal Philosophy, Faculty of Laws, University College London.
Author of: Ronald Dworkin (2nd ed, 1997) and Positivism Today (1996).

A Comparison of Integrity with Justice as a Model for Law.

8 April 2004

Amanda Williamson

PhD Student, School of Law, University of New England

Contemporary Employment Relations in Australia: Assessing the Impact of Individualism and Collectivism upon the Academic Employment Relationship

2 April 2004

Imtiaz Omar

Senior Lecturer, School of Law, University of New England

Trial of Hicks and Habib by Foreign Military Court: Constitutional Issues and Executive Decision Making

2003 Kirby Seminar Series

DateSpeaker/Topic
9 October 2003

John Coombs QC

Former President, Australian Bar Association and New South Wales Bar Association

How Can You Appear For Someone You Know Is Guilty?

19 September 2003

Stephen Colbran

Professor, School of Law, University of New England

Is The Law Lecture Dead?

12 September 2003

Mark Lunney

Associate Professor, School of Law, University of New England

Human Rights and Private Law – An Unhappy Combination?

15 August 2003

Michael Macklin

Professor and Dean of the Faculty of Arts, University of New England. Former Senator for Queensland in the Federal Parliament

Making law – the perspective of a philosopher parliamentarian

8 August 2003

Sandra Welsman

Director, Australian Centre of Agriculture and Law, University of New England

Interfaces of Agricultural Business, Science and Law

31 July 2003

Emilia Della Torre

Lecturer, School of Law, University of New England

The Buck Stops Here! Responsibilities of States for Wrongs Committed by Private Individuals

14 July 2003

Paul Latimer

Associate Professor, Department of Business Law and Taxation, Monash University

Current Issues in Corporate Governance

15 May 2003

Justice Tony North

Federal Court of Australia

On-country native title hearings

8 May 2003

Ivan Shearer

Challis Professor of International Law, University of Sydney
Member of the Order of Australia (AM), 1995

War, armed conflict and the circumstances in which any state may use force against another state without the authority of the United Nations Security Council

27 March 2003

Eric Ghosh

Lecturer, School of Law, University of New England

Constitutionalism and the Revival of the Republican Political Tradition: an Alternative Approach to Protecting Human Rights

20 March 2003

David Hamer

Lecturer, School of Law, University of New England

Justice, Probability & Juridical Proof

2002 Kirby Seminar Series

(incomplete list)

DateSpeaker/Topic
18 October 2002

Sam Garkawe

Associate Professor, School of Law and Justice, Southern Cross University

The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission – A Worthy Mechanism of Accountability or a Dangerous and Unjustified Compromise?

2001 Kirby Seminar Series

(incomplete list)

DateSpeaker/Topic
23 March 2001

Justice Michael Kirby

Justice of the High Court of Australia

The Future of Human Rights