unecolor.gif (2645 bytes)

EB General Staff

EB Minutes


 

CPSU GENERAL STAFF ENTERPRISE BARGAINING

NOTES OF MEETING

2.00PM - 5:00PM, TUESDAY 4 APRIL 2000

CONFERENCE ROOM, TC LAMBLE BUILDING

 

Present:

Brian Lancaster (Director, HR Services)

Ian Galloway (CPSU Industrial Officer)

Christopher Serow (Mgr, IR& WC)

Judy Stott (CPSU Rep)

Chris Burrell (IR Officer)

Frank Leayr (CPSU Rep)

Rebecca Wood (G/S EB Secretary)

ITEM 1. Apologies:

Peter Szacsvay

Meeting opened at 2:15pm.

Chris Serow as Chair.

ITEM 2: Minutes of Previous Meeting:

The minutes of the last meeting were accepted as a true and accurate record with the following amendments:

1. Item 1. Should read ……subject to CPSU submission of C. No. 20997 of 2000 on transcript.

2. Item 2.1 Should read for further discussion.

ITEM 3: Matters Arising from the Minutes of 28th March 2000

3.1 No Forced Retrenchments

CPSU advised that as some of its members are HEO level 10, this clause should be up to and inclusive of level 10.

UNE replied that some level 10 have other agreements and administratively it is harder to enforce at that level.

CPSU also advised in paragraph 3 it states "and incumbent in not transferred to another position" which is already covered in paragraph 2. It was also stated by the CPSU if a position is made redundent, there should be no barrier for the incumbent to take a package.

UNE advised that they would like to keep skilled employees and in some cases they might be able to have other negotiations (not financial)with that staff member.

CPSU also asked for an explanation of the following statement "to be retained as required by UNE"

Action:After some discussion it was agreed that UNE will respond to the following points raised by the CPSU

· What level the clause should include

· Redeploying fulltime staff to more than one position

· Deleting paragraph 3

· Inserting "UNE shall

a) offer redeployment

b) provide a redundancy package in accordance with the agreement.

· Explain "to be retained by UNE"

· Advise on the issue of redeploying staff two levels below their current position.

3.2 Managing Change

UNE tabled 4 documents

· Managing Organisational Change (Consultation Draft)

· Grievance Procedures for the Avoidance of Disputes (Consultation Draft)

· Emergency Contacts and Call Back Arrangements (draft)

· University of Sydney On-Call Arrangements

Action: After some discussion it was agreed that this should go on the agenda for the next meeting.

3.3 On-Call Arrangements

The UNE advised that it is their intention to have one set of guidelines across UNE and the NTEU have agreed to this.

Action: It was agreed that UNE will redraft the University of Sydney document and distribute to the CPSU.

3.4 Grievance Procedures

After some discussion with this it was agreed that UNE will table the draft award clause at the next meeting

Action: UNE to table the draft award at the next meeting

4. AIRC Recommendations

It was agreed by the parties that the UNE had complied with points one and two of the recommentdations.

CPSU advised that it had complied with point 5

UNE also advised that it is waiting on statistics from ISG before they reply to the CPSU on point 3.

5. Other Business

5.1 Salary Offer

CPSU requested information on the sign on bonus and UNE advised that they have tabled the timing of their offer and that UNE did not have the funds available to offer a sign on bonus this year.

Action: It was agreed that more discussion was needed on this matter and it should be put on the next agenda.

Next Meeting:

The next meeting between the University and the CPSU will be on Wednesday 5 April, beginning at 11:00am in the Conference Room TC Lamble Building.

Meeting closed at 4.35pm

homepage.gif (1137 bytes) top.gif (660 bytes) eb99.gif (735 bytes)

Maintained by Industrial Relations & Workplace Change.
© 1999 University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351.
Last revised: 6 April 2000
Email:rwood@metz.une.edu.au