Information you need to provide to participants
Research participation point (RPP) system
Multiple-choice questiionnaire (MCQ) for participants
Research participation labs
(RPLs)
General Comments
Advantages of this program
The form!
You will need to give your participants a research participation
lab (RPL) Information Sheet (not the information sheet
required by the HREC) at some stage after their participation
in your study. This sheet needs to be attached with this application.
This is to be no more than two pages. Students are to receive
this information sheet prior to their multiple
choice assessment (see below) based on your study as soon
as possible after they complete your study.
Students now need to have two research participation points (RPP)
to complete the research participation lab (RPL) requirements.
This means that you need to specify in the form above how many
RPP your study is worth. Generally if your study takes 1 hour
or more to complete then you should specify 2 RPP but if it is
less than 1 hour then you should specify 1 RPP.
Attach a set of 10 multiple-choice questions concerning conceptual
and methodological points of the study. Each question is to have four
alternative responses. The number of questions remains the same for
1 and 2 RPP studies. These questions must reflect a clear extrapolation
from the information gained via participation and the RPL Information
Sheet. These questions may be subject to review by the first year co-ordinator
to ensure a common level of difficulty. Keep records of student marks
on the MCQ and send electronic copies of these to the
first year co-ordinator WITHIN 7 DAYS in an alphabetised list!
You need to provide the marks in an Excel spreadsheet or a table in
MS Word with columns for surname, first name, student id, date of completion,
and mark out of 10.
Checklist for a MCQ:
- 10 questions.
- 4 answers options for each question.
- M ake sure that there is a line towards the top for students
to put their name and students number.
- Please put your name and the title of your study towards the
top of the MCQ.
- Please put the year the study is run towards the top.
- Please make it clear where students can return the MCQ to you
(please do not ask the students to return the MCQ to the superviosor
without the supervisor's permission).
Please send the multiple choice questions and answers to the first
year co-ordinator before your study is listed.
It is up to the students to contact the researcher in whose study
they wish to participate in. Each student is required to participate
in one study, or to gain 2 RPPs or to write an assignment on Issues
in Empirical Design (outlined in the students' Assignment
& Laboratory Booklet). The researcher will need to organise
study participation with the student (e.g., questionnaires by
mail or Web site, experimental studies by on-site or Web site).
Immediately after participation researchers are to send/give students
their RPL Information Sheet plus the multiple-choice questions.
Students then have two weeks to submit their answers to the multiple-choice
questions back to the researcher (e.g., hard-copy, email or Web
site). Please make sure that students are aware of this
requirement. The reason for take-home type of
assessment is due to the practical impossibility of on-site assessment
in the case of most external students. If answers are not forthcoming
within two weeks then the student automatically forfeits that
study for meeting unit requirements.
Make sure that students do not submit their multiple-choice questions
with any research material (e.g., questionnaires) if anonymity
is to be retained according to your ethics approval, a sealed
envelope containing students' multiple-choice questions and submitted
with other research material might be acceptable by the ethics
committee but you would have to get an 'ok' from the ethics committee
first.
All marks have to be sent to the first year co-ordinator
ASAP; instructions in the form above.
Any complaints or concerns about any of the research participation
laboratories should be made, in the first instance, to the co-ordinator
of first year. If complaints are not resolved to the satisfaction
of the student, they are then to contact the Head of School. Complaints
can also be made to UNE's Human Research Ethics Committee. But
note that in terms of the ethics committee, a complaint would
constitute feedback on a decision they had already made in terms
of granting approval for each study.
Researchers have to meet these obligations to the satisfaction
of the first year co-ordinator if they are to be part of this
scheme. Once involved, they must then notify the co-ordinator
if they plan to withdraw their study, so that withdrawal can be
undertaken in an appropriate manner. The primary benefits are
that students that opt to participate in studies derive a more
intimate introduction to research culture, on top of their more
general introduction to psychology as an empirical science through
their set labs, while researchers gain participants for their
studies
A survey of other psychology departments across Australia discovered
a fairly even three-way split between no research participation,
incentive participation, and obligatory participation. So why
should we favour this option of voluntary participation?
- In an otherwise tightly structured 1st year program, this
learning flexibility enables students to attain their learning
objectives in a way that favours their learning style (i.e.,
learn about research via actual participation or writing an
assignment).
- It is preferable to incentive-based schemes, as it does not
confound marks awarded for academic performance with those awarded
for pure research participation.
- An obligatory participation may also be considered in the
future. Why should we not force students to participate in research
projects, whilst at the same time requiring students to fulfil
all requirements of the units in which they are enrolled, including
set lab work. Is there any difference between a lab run in Lab
1 (set lab), and a lab run by individual members of staff
(research studies), providing that the latter meets the same
educational standards as the former?